Contemporary Independent Baptists like Josh Teis and Robert Bakss insist that style is a matter of preference, that God says nothing about style. You prefer traditional hymns; we prefer contemporary. You prefer a suit and tie; we prefer casual. You want the lights bright; we like them dim. You use a pulpit; we prefer an open stage. Potayto; potahto.
But not so fast. These men make some major leaps based on assumption. They do not attempt to prove their major premise. They beg the question; they assume what they should prove; they rely on “special pleading” to make their case.
Their major premise, that style is merely a matter of preference, exposes a serious worldview flaw. It does not faithfully represent Scripture. Ultimately, their principle of musical style undermines the worship being offered to a holy God. In response, I offer three points to consider.
First, Style is not Neutral
The idea that style is neutral, that style choices are merely preference choices, reveals a deep worldview flaw that cannot be ignored. To argue that style is a matter of preference is to say that there are areas in this world over which God makes no claim, over which Jesus Christ is not Lord. If in fact, the Lordship of Jesus Christ does not extend to our style choices, then anything goes. Why not host a Pajama Sunday? After all, how else will we reach late-night WalMart shoppers? Better yet, Continue reading “Gothpel Style”