Category: Preaching and Teaching

Preaching, Poetry, and the Power of Analogy

On By Dave MallinakIn Pastors, Preaching and Teaching, Wordsmithing1 Comment

If you haven’t read the previous post, you might find it a helpful introduction to this one.

Words work because they materialize in the visible world. Assuming we know the word, we can’t detach it from its meaning. The word represents something, either visible or invisible, and we know the meaning by the word that identifies it. God made the world this way. He made the world out of words so that the world is a visible word. And this is why metaphor works. A metaphor identifies something distinct from and yet fully identified with something else. Words themselves are metaphors because the word isn’t the material thing, but when we think of the material thing, we want to know its name.

Preachers need to know this because we deal in words. We use words to communicate God’s truth, conveying our message with words. The gospel is good news, which means the gospel is words. We ought to know the power of words to effectively communicate God’s truth.

In the previous post, we offered three treasures found in words. Here, we’ll offer two more.

Treasure #4: Poetry communicates more clearly than science.

From something less true, we can learn more truth. [1]

God is immutable.

I’ll pause while you look that up. Actually, no, I won’t. We’re all preachers reading this, so we know what immutable means. Hopefully, we have taught our churches to understand and honor the immutability of God. If we have, we know that the Bible doesn’t spend much time on the topic. Hebrews 6:18 provides the singular appearance of this amazing word. If we want our people to know what it means that God is immutable, we might find it helpful to use a more familiar yet equally Biblical expression, perhaps like this:

But the LORD is my defence; and my God is the rock of my refuge. (Psalm 94:22)

The Bible tells us that God is a rock at least twenty times. Think about that. If you demand scientific accuracy for every expression, the Bible must disappoint you terribly. If I were to ask you to explain the similarities between God and a rock, you might struggle a bit. As you take your kids hiking, how often have you pointed at a rock and said, “See that, kids! God is just like that!”

But you could. You should, in fact. God identifies Himself that way. If I’m honest, I can only think of one or two qualities of a rock that resemble God – a rock is unchangeable; a great big rock is nearly immovable. But the Bible says, “God is a rock.” Not that He is every way like a rock or a rock is every way like God. But a rock depicts God’s immutability in a way we can grasp, in a way that the word “immutable” doesn’t.

If you want your kids to know that God is immutable, tell them that God is a rock. A child can grasp that.

But that isn’t true for kids only. Think of the way science expresses truth compared to poetry. Science always wants to quantify things, usually with a number. On a scale of 1-to-10, how much pain are you feeling? A 55-year-old gets a senior discount. And on a cold day, temperatures might dip into the teens or even below zero.

Now, of course, this scientific mode of expression has become familiar enough to us that we know the lingo. We may have never considered how inane the idea of “zero” degrees of temperature might be. We might wish we could store a few degrees when it is 100 outside and pull them out of the pantry when it is zero. But what about below zero? What does that even mean? If my bank balance gets below zero, I’m in trouble. Does that mean we’re in trouble when temperatures get below zero? Do they owe us something they need to repay?

The scientific or “analytical” paradigm takes itself very seriously and sometimes acts as if accuracy is more important than clarity. But the Bible doesn’t rely on the analytical paradigm as often as we might think. The Bible is much more likely to describe God as a fire, Jesus as bread or light or water, the Bible as a sword, and a contentious woman as a continual dripping on a very rainy day. The Bible doesn’t get all that technical. In fact, the scientific way of saying things is more precise and accurate, but also more abstract. If you don’t believe me, draw me a picture of a degree. Not just one – draw me fifty of them huddled together in the air surrounding your house on a warm spring afternoon. Show me what a degree looks like, and we’ll discuss how great scientific expression really is. And tell me which expression makes it more apparent that Tom Bombadil is quite old – if I tell you his age in years or if I quote Tolkien:

There’s earth under his old feet, and clay on his fingers; wisdom in his bones, and both his eyes are open.

The poetic way of saying things (imprecise but more concrete) is often the Bible way of saying things.

A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver. (Proverbs 25:11)

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing. (I Corinthians 13:1-3)

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell. (James 3:6)

The Bible speaks this way for a simple reason: we understand it better. The concrete images used in poetic speech aren’t always the most accurate, but they express the idea in a way our minds can grasp.

How should this affect our preaching? We should recognize first that theology, like any science, uses a fair amount of jargon that the noninitiates might not recognize. You can speak of “getting saved,” the “atonement,” “justification,” “sanctification,” and the “vicarious” suffering of Christ all day long. Half your audience will have no idea what you mean.

Continue reading “Preaching, Poetry, and the Power of Analogy” →

Hey Preacher, Love the Word(s)

On By Dave MallinakIn Pastors, Preaching and Teaching, Wordsmithing1 Comment

Carpenters work with nails and screws and lumber. Plumbers work with pipe. Electricians work with wire. Preachers work with words. They aren’t the only ones to do this, of course. Carpenters work with words, too. So do electricians, lawyers, doctors, bureaucrats, and auto mechanics. Words are the currency of culture.

But preachers particularly work with words. Words are the raw material for sermons. With words, the gospel is preached, and men repent and believe.

Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. (I Peter 1:23-25)

Auto mechanics study engines and tools. Doctors study the human body and medicines. Preachers must know the Word. But knowing the Word requires a knowledge of words. If you love the Word, it is only natural that you would love words. Words are your craft. Despite the inevitable sneers, you are called to be a wordsmith.

Continue reading “Hey Preacher, Love the Word(s)” →

Preaching, Proof, and Binding the Conscience

On By Dave MallinakIn Pastors, Preaching and Teaching1 Comment

The great design and intention of the office of a Christian preacher (is) to restore the throne and dominion of God in the souls of men. (Cotton Mather)

To preach is to prove, and to prove is to bind the conscience. Every sermon sets forth the certainty of the things of Scripture and calls the people to believe and do what the Bible says. Or maybe I should say that every sermon should do this. We don’t need to ask whether the preacher will bind the conscience, but how he will bind it and what truth he will preach as binding on the conscience.

But that raises a myriad of questions: What is proof? What kind of certainty do we look for? What types of proofs should we use? Do emotional proofs count? Should the church be bound by every opinion the pastor holds? Is proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” or “beyond a shadow of a doubt?”

Continue reading “Preaching, Proof, and Binding the Conscience” →

The Art of Punchy Preaching

On By Dave MallinakIn Independent Baptists, Pastors, Preaching and Teaching1 Comment

The words of wise men are heard in quiet more than the cry of him that ruleth among fools. (Ecclesiastes 9:17)

You might not think of Jordan Peterson as an entertainer. His events involve a lecture that lasts an hour and a half to two hours. He isn’t bombastic or edgy but deeply philosophical. If you watch one of these online, you’ll notice the rapt attention that his audience gives him – so quiet, if someone scratches their head, you can hear the dandruff fall. If you wish to attend one of his events, be prepared to shell out a minimum of $65. If you want to sit up close, the price will be closer to $150. This coming Friday, you can hear him in Nashville. There are less than 1,000 seats left in the 20,000-seat Bridgestone Arena. Or you could wait until next week and attend his show at the ~6,000-seat Radio City Music Hall. You’ll pay about $112 for a seat, but you’ll need to hurry – there are about 200 seats left.

Perhaps we could dismiss this as the product of fallen man seeking a saving answer to our depravity through moralistic philosophy. Preachers might struggle to fill an arena if they gave the seats away for free. Even the mega-churches tend to draw them in with music, then slip in a short, entertaining talk that some might identify as a “sermon.”

My point is not that preachers should try to be Jordan Peterson. The man is highly skilled at walking along the cliff’s edge of godless philosophy without slipping into Biblical Christianity. I mean to point out how manifestly false it is that you can’t hold an audience’s attention unless you include lots of bling and keep the sermon to a half hour. People will listen if you have something to say.

Continue reading “The Art of Punchy Preaching” →

The Science of Punchy Preaching

On By Dave MallinakIn Enjoying God, Pastors, Preaching and Teaching2 Comments

There is no particular advantage to being seriously unreadable. The same can be said for preachers. Don’t preach sermons nobody wants to hear. As I see it, preaching has two priorities: to faithfully proclaim the message of Scripture and to be heard by God’s people. Or, put another way, the preacher aims to provide good food which the people are glad to eat. Good food cooked well is appetizing, even if you aren’t hungry. Let the cook work her magic, and the hungry will be fed.

Continue reading “The Science of Punchy Preaching” →

Topical Opinionating

On By Dave MallinakIn Expository, Independent Baptists, Pastors, Preaching and Teaching

I’m not opposed to topical preaching per se. I think there is a case for it. The sermons recorded in the New Testament seem more topical than expository to me. For example, on the day of Pentecost, Peter argued as his thesis that the miracle the people were witnessing was not the product of drunkenness but a fulfillment of Joel’s prophesy in Joel 2:28-32. Peter brought in Psalm 16:8-11 as a supporting witness. The Sanhedrin charged Stephen with speaking “blasphemous words against ‘this holy place’ (the Temple) and the law: For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered us” (Acts 6:13-14). Stephen answered by rehearsing the whole history of Moses and the Temple with this conclusion:

Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest? Hath not my hand made all these things? (Acts 7:48-50)

His conclusion patches together parts of Solomon’s dedication of the Temple (I Kings 8:27), an allusion to Psalm 11:4, Michaiah’s warning to King Jehoshaphat (I Kings 19:22), and every Old Testament passage that declares God the creator of all things (Ex 20:11; Ps 33:6-9; 50:9-12; 146:5-6; Isa 40:28; 44:24; 45:7-8,12; Jer 10:11; 32:17).

In the Pisidian Antioch synagogue (Acts 13:14-41), Paul preached that “Of this man’s (David’s) seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Saviour, Jesus” (23). As proof, he rehearsed the ministry of John the Baptist (24-25), the history of their dealings with Jesus (26-31), and showed from the Old Testament the truth of the claim that “the promise which was made unto the fathers (that “to you is the word of this salvation sent” – v. 26), God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again” (32-33). His proofs are taken from the second Psalm, the Davidic Covenant (2 Samuel 7:14-16; Psalm 89:2-4), Psalm 16:10, and the historic contrast between David (who saw corruption) and Jesus of Nazareth (who didn’t). He then repeats the warning of Habakuk 1:5, calling the Jews to repent or perish.

We could continue. Paul’s most famous sermon, which he delivered to the gathered philosophers on Mars’ Hill, includes a handful of Old Testament allusions but does not expound any particular text of Scripture.

At a minimum, New Testament sermon samples allow for the occasional topical sermon. I would point out that the sermons recorded in Acts are given in defense of the gospel, primarily to the Jews but also to the Gentiles (on Mars’ Hill). Preaching to the gathered body of Christ in the New Testament church should mainly focus on expounding the whole of Scripture, “line upon line, precept upon precept.” There is a place for “comparing Scripture with Scripture,” of course, but that should be done to give a thorough presentation of the passage.

Continue reading “Topical Opinionating” →

The Danger of Allegorizing

On By Dave MallinakIn Expository, Pastors, Preaching and Teaching4 Comments

If I were a betting man, I would give two-to-one odds on my annual salary that you’ve heard at least one sermon on David and Goliath where the preacher preached that you too can slay your giants.

David and Goliath might be the most frequently allegorized passage in the Bible. It has been used (and abused) until we almost can’t think of it any other way. I was with a group of fellow pastors a few years ago, and I commented that we tend to make Bible stories about ourselves instead of Christ or instead of seeing why God gave us that story. I gave the story of David and Goliath as a case in point. One of my fellow pastors immediately objected to the notion that the story of David and Goliath might be about Jesus. “That’s allegorizing,” he said. I asked him how it is allegorizing to make it about Jesus but not allegorizing to make it about me?

To allegorize is to interpret symbolically. When we allegorize a passage, we look for hidden spiritual meanings that transcend the text’s literal meaning. “Commentators who use allegory deserve high marks for creativity but low marks for approaching the biblical account as literature.” (Haddon Robinson, Biblical Preaching, 59)

Continue reading “The Danger of Allegorizing” →

Expository Preaching 101

On By Dave MallinakIn Expository, Preaching and Teaching3 Comments

The great design and intention of the office of a Christian preacher (is) to restore the throne and dominion of God in the souls of men. (Cotton Mather)

So, what exactly is expository preaching? Among Independent Baptists, expository preaching is greatly derided and ridiculed. Most consider it to be about two degrees north of dead. I often hear it treated as if every sermon were another episode in deep-sea diving. People fear they’ll run out of oxygen before they resurface. In general, expository preaching is thought to have the same value as a wet blanket – good at extinguishing whatever fire and vigor a church has left in it.

Haddon Robinson described preaching as “a living interaction involving God, the preacher, and the congregation.” He offered this working definition of expository preaching.

Expository preaching is the communication of a biblical concept, derived from and transmitted through a historical, grammatical, and literary study of a passage in its context, which the Holy Spirit first applies to the personality and experience of the preacher, then through the preacher, applies to the hearers. (Biblical Preaching: The Development and Delivery of Expository Messages, p. 5)

Expository preaching operates on the assumption that the Bible comes from one mind and delivers one message. Every passage of Scripture is part of God’s entire message to mankind. And every passage of Scripture contributes an essential part of that message. So, when examining any passage of the Bible, expository preaching seeks to uncover and proclaim the message a loving, heavenly Father has for His children.

Things like “zeal,” “fire,” and “passion” can be faked. Many preachers function by ranting and raving and consider yelling and screaming essential elements of the sermon. Their passion buckets are full, but their sermon mostly lacks substance. They are like a dry thunderstorm on a hot summer day – full of noise but no refreshing rain.

Continue reading “Expository Preaching 101” →

That Ain’t Expository Preaching

On By Dave MallinakIn Expository, Issues Facing the Church, Pastors, Preaching and Teaching

Expository preaching gets a bad rap nowadays. The blame for it can’t fall entirely on those who lampoon it and draw cute caricatures. Some blame belongs to those who think they preach expository sermons but don’t. And some of the responsibility rests squarely on the shoulders of expository preachers.

Orthocrusty is hard to defend, no matter what style it uses. God didn’t call preachers to be “bland leaders of the bland.” Regardless of your style, if your preaching is as dry as cracker juice, you aren’t preaching. Philips Brooks said preaching has “two essential elements: truth and personality.” Dr. A.E. Garvie added, “Preaching is not merely a communication of knowledge. As it exercises the whole personality of the preacher, so it is addressed to the whole personality of the hearer as a moral and religious subject.” [1]

Photo by Greg Gulik on Pexels.com

Preaching that lacks Scriptural content isn’t preaching, nor is preaching that lacks personality. If expository preaching has a bad reputation in some circles, blame it on the tendency to bake the sermon for an hour at 425o, run it through the microwave, leave it out in the sun, and set it under a heat lamp until it is thoroughly dehydrated. A sermon worth preaching won’t much resemble the Sahara in the dry season.

But the fault in dry preaching isn’t the Word preached or the style of preaching. The fault is in the preacher, who loved his study more than his people, who gets more joy in saying what he knows than in communicating truth. A change of style won’t likely fix that.

Many believe topical preaching is livelier, though more shallow, than expository preaching. Some see it as a necessary trade-off. And, all things being equal, it is easier to rant and rave when we have nothing to say, and it might be more essential. Shallow preaching becomes a performing art.

But I am for expository preaching. I decided to preach this way when God put me in the ministry, and I have tried to learn the craft over these many years. A good friend of mine made this remark, which I wholeheartedly endorse:

Expositional preaching should be thought of as an “entry point” to preaching. A preacher must know how to do that before he should move on to other styles. The process shapes the way you think…even when not preaching that exact style of sermon.

I’ve preached my share of forgettable messages. I’ve left the church gasping “Water!” more than once. But prefer overcooked steak to wonder bread – which retains that surprisingly moist texture long after it should have turned stale. Nothing stirs the heart quite like a preacher who has been set on fire by the text or passage he intends to preach.

That said, this particular missive aims to strip away some of the false notions of what constitutes “expository preaching.” Lord willing, we’ll come back and discuss what it is. For now, we’ll discuss what it ain’t (with apologies to Aunt Gertie, who hates that word).

Continue reading “That Ain’t Expository Preaching” →

He Shall Direct Thy Paths, part 2

On By Dave MallinakIn Cessationism, Continuationism, Hot Topics, Independent Baptists, Preaching and Teaching3 Comments

In the initial post on God’s guidance, we argued that we can be sure of God’s leading in our lives. Besides the many places in Scripture that teach us to look for His direction, we can add that the entirety of Scripture would lead us to believe that God will guide us.  God is our Father; we are His sons and daughters by adoption. If a good father directs His children, how much more can we look to our Heavenly Father to lead us and guide us in the way we should go? “No good thing will he withhold from them that walk uprightly.” God isn’t moving the football, concealing His will, or being tricksy or coy with us. Since God wants His children to do His will, we can be sure that God will guide us and not withhold the information we need like a catty secretary.

We know this also because God’s Holy Spirit indwells us, and a vital part of His ministry includes teaching and instructing us.

But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. (I John 2:27)

The Bible doesn’t teach us to look for the same method or means of guidance as we see men in the early church receiving. Remember that the Holy Spirit worked more overtly and sensationally then. Without the entire canon of Scripture, God allowed men to walk by sight. 

In our day, God expects us to live by faith, looking to His Word more than we look for signs or sensations. So, we don’t look for God to speak to us now the way He spoke to the men of that day. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look for God to guide us at all.

Continue reading “He Shall Direct Thy Paths, part 2” →